Antwerp or Rotterdam?
Two destinations compared on nine measures of openly sourced data. Weight what matters to you and the verdict follows.
Your match
Wins on nightlife and museums & heritage with your weighting.
Wins on beaches & swimming and good for families with your weighting.
What matters to you?
Pick a travel style or drag the sliders. The match scores above update as you do.
The verdict
Choose Antwerp if you want a compact city trip: bars and clubs concentrated near the centre, museums a short walk apart, and more UNESCO-listed places within day-trip reach.
Choose Rotterdam if you are travelling with children or want the coast: 22 beaches nearby against Antwerp's 1, about twice as many attractions near the centre, and 8 theme parks within reach.
Scoreboard
Each measure scored 0 to 100. Open a row for the figures behind the score.
Beaches & swimming. Rotterdam leads by 37 points.37
| Antwerp | Rotterdam | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 0 | 37 |
| Swim season months | 0 | 0 |
| Beaches 10 km | 1 | 22 |
| Coast distance | 21 km | 24 km |
| Water distance | — | 24 km |
Places to eat. Antwerp leads by 3 points.3
| Antwerp | Rotterdam | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 75 | 72 |
| Restaurants within 2 km of centre | 1,164 | 862 |
| Effective number of cuisines within 2 km | 42 | 46 |
Museums & heritage. Antwerp leads by 9 points.9
| Antwerp | Rotterdam | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 69 | 60 |
| Museums within 10 km | 41 | 41 |
| Museums within 2 km of centre | 27 | 20 |
| Share of museums within 2 km % | 66 | 49 |
| Unesco sites within 50 km | 9 | 5 |
Nightlife. Antwerp leads by 10 points.10
| Antwerp | Rotterdam | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 59 | 49 |
| Drinking venues within 4 km | 866 | 542 |
| Drinking venues within 2 km of centre | 657 | 378 |
| Share of drinking venues within 2 km % | 76 | 70 |
| Nightclubs within 4 km | 73 | 40 |
Nature & day trips. Rotterdam leads by 8 points.8
| Antwerp | Rotterdam | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 34 | 42 |
| Protected land share 50 km % | 7 | 10 |
| Landscape blanket share 50 km % | 0 | 0 |
| Land share of disc % | 80 | 79 |
| Park area within 2 km | 53 hectares | 61 hectares |
Good for families. Rotterdam leads by 16 points.16
| Antwerp | Rotterdam | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 46 | 62 |
| Tourist attractions within 2 km | 14 | 27 |
| Park area within 2 km | 53 hectares | 61 hectares |
| Theme parks within 30 km | 3 | 8 |
Sights concentration. Antwerp leads by 3 points.3
| Antwerp | Rotterdam | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 54 | 51 |
| Notable places within 2 km | 88 | 74 |
| Min wikipedia languages | 5 | 5 |
Value for money. Antwerp leads by 2 points.2
| Antwerp | Rotterdam | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 60 | 58 |
| Price level global | 76.2 | 79.2 |
| Daily budget | €180 | €181 |
Year-round weather. Antwerp leads by 2 points.2
| Antwerp | Rotterdam | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 58 | 56 |
| Monthly daytime high | 6.5 °C to 23.2 °C | 6.2 °C to 22.1 °C |
| Monthly rainfall | 47 mm to 90 mm | 42 mm to 85 mm |
| Dry months | 0 | 0 |
Where they differ
Antwerp has about twice as many places to drink and twice as many nightclubs as Rotterdam, most of them near the centre, so evenings need less planning. Its museums sit tightly around the centre, and it has 9 UNESCO-listed places within day-trip reach against Rotterdam's 5.
Rotterdam has 22 beaches nearby against Antwerp's 1, though the sea only reaches 19°C in August. For families it has about twice as many attractions near the centre, more park space, and 8 theme parks within reach against Antwerp's 3.
Where they are alike
Year-round the two feel much alike. Daytime highs run 7-23°C in Antwerp and 6-22°C in Rotterdam, warm summers and cool rather than cold winters, and neither has a month at 40mm of rain or less.
Both put their restaurants, museums and notable places within walking distance of the centre, with a similar range of kitchens, and the national price estimates behind them sit close together, €180 for Belgium and €181 for the Netherlands.
Which traveller are you?
A couple after evenings out will prefer Antwerp: about twice as many bars and twice as many clubs as Rotterdam, nearly all near the centre, with museums close enough to fill the afternoon before.
Families are better served in Rotterdam: roughly twice as many attractions near the centre, more park space, 8 theme parks within reach against Antwerp's 3, and 22 beaches nearby for a change of scene.
Anyone planning day trips can go either way. Antwerp has more UNESCO-listed places within day-trip reach, while Rotterdam has more protected land around it, 10% against 7%, and more park space near the centre.
What the numbers don't tell you
The daily budget is a national estimate of restaurant and hotel prices, €180 for Belgium and €181 for the Netherlands, not a measurement of either city. A much-visited city can sit well above its country's average, by more than the gap between these figures, so neither reads as the cheaper trip.
Rotterdam's beaches count for more on paper than in the water: the sea peaks at 19°C in August, one of the wetter months at 84mm. Its family attractions cluster near the centre, which in high summer means crowds in a small area.
When should you go?
The figures behind each month. Each row is shaded against that destination's own year, so the deepest cell is its best month for that measure and the palest its weakest. Shades are not comparable between the two rows.
Temperature and rainfall are thirty-year climate normals, averaged over the years shown. Antwerp: 1991-2020 normals, Antwerpen / Deurne (5.2 km from centre). Rotterdam: 1993-2020 (sunshine 1991-2020, rainfall 1991-2020) normals, Rotterdam Airport Zestienhoven (3.9 km from centre).
Antwerp is the warmer choice in high summer, with highs of 23°C in July and August, though the latter brings 90mm of rain. April is its driest month and already mild, good for walking between museums.
Rotterdam suits anyone wanting the water: the sea reaches 19°C by late summer, with daytime highs of 22°C. Its autumn is the wetter of the two, 81mm in October against Antwerp's 71mm, so keep beach days to midsummer.
Getting there
| Flying from | Antwerp | Rotterdam |
|---|---|---|
| MadridMAD | 2 h 15 m €98-170 BRU · 36 km | 2 h 25 m €160-183 AMS · 47 km |
| DublinDUB | 1 h 35 m no fares BRU · 36 km | 1 h 35 m €69-96 AMS · 47 km |
| CopenhagenCPH | 1 h 35 m €117-136 1 stop BRU · 36 km | 1 h 25 m €171-212 1 stop AMS · 47 km |
| New YorkJFK, EWR, LGA | 7 h 35 m no fares BRU · 36 km | 7 h 35 m €512-556 1 stop AMS · 47 km |
| DubaiDXB, DWC | 6 h 45 m no fares BRU · 36 km | 6 h 45 m €318-346 1 stop AMS · 47 km |
| ManchesterMAN | 1 h 20 m no fares CRL · 85 km | 1 h 15 m €145-187 AMS · 47 km |
| CuracaoCUR | 9 h 55 m no fares AMS · 123 km | 9 h 55 m no fares AMS · 47 km |
| StockholmARN, BMA, NYO, VST | 2 h 10 m €63-138 BRU · 36 km | 2 h 0 m €156-208 AMS · 47 km |
| ParisCDG, ORY, BVA | 1 h 0 m no fares BRU · 36 km | 1 h 10 m €178-300 AMS · 47 km |
| ShanghaiPVG, SHA | 11 h 15 m no fares BRU · 36 km | 11 h 10 m no fares AMS · 47 km |
The busiest departure cities for these two, with a place kept for each other part of the world. Busiest means arriving passengers where an official count exists, and where none does, the number of non-stop services flown: official route statistics are published by the European reporting countries and by nobody else, so a table ranked on them alone would offer a reader in New York or Tokyo ten European cities. Flying times are estimated from the distance between airports, and every row is a city flown non-stop to both. Where the typical offer connects anyway, the stops are shown. Under each figure is the airport the flight lands at and how far that is from the centre, because the nearest airport is not always the one a route is flown to. Where both columns name the same airport it is one flight, and the difference between the two is the distance printed beside it. Typical return fares for 2026-08 to 2026-10, cached market data up to 7 days old. The figure is the middle half of the offers found, so a single price means they agreed and a range means they did not; for a typical route that middle half spans about a quarter of the median, and for the least settled routes rather more than the median itself.
Before you go
| Measure | Antwerp | Rotterdam |
|---|---|---|
| Official language | French, German, Dutch | Dutch |
| Currency | Euro (EUR) | Euro (EUR) |
| Sockets | CE230 V, 50 Hz | CF230 V, 50 Hz |
| Driving side | Right | Right |
| Time zone | UTC+1, UTC+2 in summer | UTC+1, UTC+2 in summer |
| Emergency number | 112 | 112 or 911 |
| Elevation | 7 m | 10 m |
| Main airport | Brussels Airport (BRU)36 km from centre191 non-stop destinations | Rotterdam The Hague Airport (RTM)5 km from centre45 non-stop destinations |
| Public holidays this year | 14 days | 11 days |
By the numbers
| Measure | Antwerp | Rotterdam |
|---|---|---|
| City population | 529,247 | 664,311 |
| People per km² | 2,542 | 2,080 |
| Museums within 10 km | 38 | 40 |
| UNESCO World Heritage sites within 50 km | 9 | 5 |
| Distinct cuisines in the centre | 80 | 77 |
| Swim season, months above 21 °C | – | None |
Where else could you go?
Every comparison below shares a destination with this one, so you can follow Antwerp or Rotterdam somewhere new.