Como or Verona?
Two destinations compared on nine measures of openly sourced data. Weight what matters to you and the verdict follows.
Your match
Wins on nature & day trips with your weighting.
Wins on good for families and sights concentration with your weighting.
What matters to you?
Pick a travel style or drag the sliders. The match scores above update as you do.
The verdict
Choose Como if the point of the trip is the lake and the country around it: more protected land within reach, more UNESCO-listed places on day trips, and quiet evenings rather than a long list of bars.
Choose Verona if you want the compact option: a centre with about three times as many notable places within walking distance, twice as many restaurants, and theme parks within reach for children.
Scoreboard
Each measure scored 0 to 100. Open a row for the figures behind the score.
Beaches & swimming. Como and Verona are level on 0.
| Como | Verona | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 0 | 0 |
| Swim season months | 0 | 0 |
| Beaches 10 km | 8 | 2 |
| Coast distance | 156 km | 104 km |
| Water distance | — | — |
Places to eat. Verona leads by 18 points.18
| Como | Verona | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 25 | 43 |
| Restaurants within 2 km of centre | 259 | 477 |
| Effective number of cuisines within 2 km | 7 | 13 |
Museums & heritage. Verona leads by 10 points.10
| Como | Verona | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 46 | 56 |
| Museums within 10 km | 9 | 20 |
| Museums within 2 km of centre | 6 | 19 |
| Share of museums within 2 km % | 67 | 95 |
| Unesco sites within 50 km | 8 | 5 |
Nightlife. Verona leads by 16 points.16
| Como | Verona | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 24 | 40 |
| Drinking venues within 4 km | 213 | 416 |
| Drinking venues within 2 km of centre | 143 | 269 |
| Share of drinking venues within 2 km % | 67 | 65 |
| Nightclubs within 4 km | 1 | 9 |
Nature & day trips. Como leads by 4 points.4
| Como | Verona | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 40 | 36 |
| Protected land share 50 km % | 23 | 9 |
| Landscape blanket share 50 km % | 5 | 0 |
| Land share of disc % | 100 | 100 |
| Park area within 2 km | 15 hectares | 59 hectares |
Good for families. Verona leads by 54 points.54
| Como | Verona | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 15 | 69 |
| Tourist attractions within 2 km | 6 | 62 |
| Park area within 2 km | 15 hectares | 59 hectares |
| Theme parks within 30 km | 0 | 4 |
Sights concentration. Verona leads by 23 points.23
| Como | Verona | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 30 | 53 |
| Notable places within 2 km | 22 | 82 |
| Min wikipedia languages | 5 | 5 |
Value for money. Como and Verona are level on 68.
| Como | Verona | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 68 | 68 |
| Price level global | 64.9 | 64.9 |
| Daily budget | €155 | €155 |
Year-round weather. Verona leads by 7 points.7
| Como | Verona | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 58 | 65 |
| Monthly daytime high | 7.1 °C to 27.3 °C | 6.8 °C to 30.3 °C |
| Monthly rainfall | 61 mm to 178 mm | 38 mm to 85 mm |
| Dry months | 0 | 1 |
Where they differ
Como's advantage is the ground beyond the town. 23% of the land around it is protected against 9% around Verona, and it has 8 UNESCO-listed places within day-trip reach where Verona has 5. It also has 8 beaches on the lake against Verona's 2.
Verona is the stronger city: about twice as many restaurants near the centre, a wider range of kitchens, and about three times as many notable places within walking distance. It also has more park space and 4 theme parks within reach where Como has none.
Where they are alike
Neither sits on the sea. Como has 8 lake beaches and Verona 2, but neither has a month with water at 21°C or more, so swimming is incidental rather than a reason to book either.
The climates run close, too: both sit at 7°C in January and both have their warmest month in July. On heritage they overlap as well, with museums in town and UNESCO-listed places within day-trip reach of each.
Which traveller are you?
Families with children: Verona. It has 4 theme parks within reach where Como has none, several times as many attractions near the centre, and about three times as much park space close in for breaks between sights.
A weekend of eating and going out: Verona again. Twice as many restaurants near the centre and a wider range of kitchens, twice as many bars and many times more clubs, most of them walkable from the middle.
Walkers and day-trippers: Como. 23% of the surrounding land is protected against 9% around Verona, 8 UNESCO-listed places sit within day-trip reach, and the lake adds 8 beaches for a swim between walks.
What the numbers don't tell you
The value comparison between these two carries no information: the figure is a national price level and is identical for both by construction. The €155 a day beside it is one national estimate, not a measurement of Como or Verona, so it cannot tell you which trip costs more.
Como's 8 lake beaches sound like a swimming holiday, but the data shows no month with water at 21°C or more, and the months when the air is warmest are also the months carrying 158-178mm of rain. Verona's strongest months are drier, but its heaviest rain falls in September, when temperatures are still good for sightseeing.
When should you go?
The figures behind each month. Each row is shaded against that destination's own year, so the deepest cell is its best month for that measure and the palest its weakest. Shades are not comparable between the two rows.
Temperature and rainfall are thirty-year climate normals, averaged over the years shown. Como: 1991-2020 normals, Lugano (23 km from centre). Verona: 1991-2020 normals, Verona / Villafranca (11.6 km from centre).
Como peaks in July and August, with highs of 27°C, but the warm half of the year is also the wet half: 158mm in each of those months and 172-178mm in May and June. Its driest spell, February and March at 61-76mm, only reaches 9-14°C.
Verona's window is wider and drier. May and June give 24-28°C with 68-72mm, September holds 25°C but is its wettest month at 85mm, and July and August run hot at 30°C. Rain stays lighter than Como's all year.
Getting there
| Flying from | Como | Verona |
|---|---|---|
| LondonLHR, LGW, STN, LTN +2 | 1 h 45 m €48-103 MXP · 34 km | 1 h 55 m no fares VRN · 10 km |
| CataniaCTA | 1 h 55 m €36-88 MXP · 34 km | 1 h 45 m €40-90 VRN · 10 km |
| PalermoPMO | 1 h 45 m €27-28 MXP · 34 km | 1 h 40 m no fares VRN · 10 km |
| ViennaVIE | 1 h 25 m €65-131 MXP · 34 km | 1 h 10 m €65-121 VCE · 106 km |
| BucharestOTP, BBU | 2 h 10 m €54-129 BGY · 51 km | 1 h 55 m €50-66 TSF · 96 km |
| New YorkJFK, EWR, LGA | 8 h 15 m €542-635 1 stop MXP · 34 km | 8 h 30 m €637-650 VCE · 106 km |
| ParisCDG, ORY, BVA | 1 h 20 m €46-63 MXP · 34 km | 1 h 35 m no fares VRN · 10 km |
| DubaiDXB, DWC | 6 h 10 m €375-563 MXP · 34 km | 5 h 55 m €366-421 2 stops VCE · 106 km |
| BeijingPEK, PKX | 10 h 10 m €710-815 1 stop MXP · 34 km | 9 h 55 m no fares VCE · 106 km |
| CancunCUN | 11 h 0 m no fares MXP · 34 km | 11 h 10 m no fares VRN · 10 km |
The busiest departure cities for these two, with a place kept for each other part of the world. Busiest means arriving passengers where an official count exists, and where none does, the number of non-stop services flown: official route statistics are published by the European reporting countries and by nobody else, so a table ranked on them alone would offer a reader in New York or Tokyo ten European cities. Flying times are estimated from the distance between airports, and every row is a city flown non-stop to both. Where the typical offer connects anyway, the stops are shown. Under each figure is the airport the flight lands at and how far that is from the centre, because the nearest airport is not always the one a route is flown to. Where both columns name the same airport it is one flight, and the difference between the two is the distance printed beside it. Typical return fares for 2026-08 to 2026-10, cached market data up to 7 days old. The figure is the middle half of the offers found, so a single price means they agreed and a range means they did not; for a typical route that middle half spans about a quarter of the median, and for the least settled routes rather more than the median itself.
Before you go
| Measure | Como | Verona |
|---|---|---|
| Official language | Italian | Italian |
| Currency | Euro (EUR) | Euro (EUR) |
| Sockets | CFL230 V, 50 Hz | CFL230 V, 50 Hz |
| Driving side | Right | Right |
| Time zone | UTC+1, UTC+2 in summer | UTC+1, UTC+2 in summer |
| Emergency number | 112 | 112 |
| Elevation | 201 m | 59 m |
| Main airport | Milan Malpensa International Airport (MXP)34 km from centre203 non-stop destinations | Verona Villafranca Valerio Catullo Airport (VRN)10 km from centre86 non-stop destinations |
| Public holidays this year | 13 days | 13 days |
By the numbers
| Measure | Como | Verona |
|---|---|---|
| City population | 83,184 | 255,588 |
| People per km² | 2,242 | 1,285 |
| Museums within 10 km | 9 | 18 |
| UNESCO World Heritage sites within 50 km | 8 | 5 |
| Distinct cuisines in the centre | 22 | 35 |
Where else could you go?
Every comparison below shares a destination with this one, so you can follow Como or Verona somewhere new.