Seattle or San Francisco?
Two destinations compared on nine measures of openly sourced data. Weight what matters to you and the verdict follows.
Your match
Has no clear advantage with the weighting you have chosen.
Wins on nature & day trips and year-round weather with your weighting.
What matters to you?
Pick a travel style or drag the sliders. The match scores above update as you do.
The verdict
Choose San Francisco if you want a season that stretches from spring into October, with more restaurants, bars and clubs near the centre and more protected land within day-trip reach.
Choose Seattle if the water matters most: more beaches close by, a shorter walk to the shore, and a hotter peak summer at 25°C, accepting a much shorter dry window.
Scoreboard
Each measure scored 0 to 100. Open a row for the figures behind the score.
Beaches & swimming. Seattle and San Francisco are level on 60.
| Seattle | San Francisco | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 60 | 60 |
| Swim season months | 0 | 0 |
| Beaches 10 km | 100 | 44 |
| Coast distance | 1 km | 2 km |
| Water distance | 1 km | 2 km |
Places to eat. San Francisco leads by 8 points.8
| Seattle | San Francisco | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 75 | 83 |
| Restaurants within 2 km of centre | 1,460 | 2,359 |
| Effective number of cuisines within 2 km | 35 | 39 |
Museums & heritage. San Francisco leads by 8 points.8
| Seattle | San Francisco | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 36 | 44 |
| Museums within 10 km | 28 | 57 |
| Museums within 2 km of centre | 17 | 29 |
| Share of museums within 2 km % | 61 | 51 |
| Unesco sites within 50 km | 0 | 0 |
Nightlife. San Francisco leads by 11 points.11
| Seattle | San Francisco | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 57 | 68 |
| Drinking venues within 4 km | 873 | 1,434 |
| Drinking venues within 2 km of centre | 696 | 928 |
| Share of drinking venues within 2 km % | 80 | 65 |
| Nightclubs within 4 km | 34 | 97 |
Nature & day trips. San Francisco leads by 20 points.20
| Seattle | San Francisco | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 40 | 60 |
| Protected land share 50 km % | 9 | 17 |
| Landscape blanket share 50 km % | 0 | 4 |
| Land share of disc % | 80 | 57 |
| Park area within 2 km | 63 hectares | 45 hectares |
Good for families. San Francisco leads by 11 points.11
| Seattle | San Francisco | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 46 | 57 |
| Tourist attractions within 2 km | 17 | 48 |
| Park area within 2 km | 63 hectares | 45 hectares |
| Theme parks within 30 km | 1 | 1 |
Sights concentration. San Francisco leads by 11 points.11
| Seattle | San Francisco | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 52 | 63 |
| Notable places within 2 km | 76 | 147 |
| Min wikipedia languages | 5 | 5 |
Value for money. Seattle and San Francisco are level on 43.
| Seattle | San Francisco | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 43 | 43 |
| Price level global | 100 | 100 |
| Daily budget | — | — |
Year-round weather. San Francisco leads by 17 points.17
| Seattle | San Francisco | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 61 | 78 |
| Monthly daytime high | 7.8 °C to 24.9 °C | 14 °C to 23.2 °C |
| Monthly rainfall | 15 mm to 160 mm | 0 mm to 105 mm |
| Dry months | 3 | 7 |
Where they differ
San Francisco has about twice as many restaurants and drinking places near the centre as Seattle, and about three times as many nightclubs, most of them close in. It is also the better base for getting out: 17% of the surrounding land is protected against 9% around Seattle, and 7 months of the year see 40mm of rain or less, against 3 in Seattle.
Seattle answers with the coast: 100 beaches nearby against San Francisco's 44, the water closer to the centre, and warmer summer highs at 25°C.
Where they are alike
Both sit on the water without being swimming destinations: the sea is 1km from Seattle's centre and 2km from San Francisco's, yet neither has a month with sea at 21°C or more, and the warmest water reaches 14°C and 12°C respectively.
They are close on eating and heritage too: both cover a similar range of kitchens, and neither has a UNESCO-listed place within day-trip reach, so museums are a supporting act in each.
Which traveller are you?
Eating and going out: San Francisco, with about twice as many restaurants and drinking places near the centre, roughly three times the nightclubs, and about twice as many notable places within walking distance.
Walkers and day-trippers: San Francisco again, with 17% of the surrounding land protected against 9%, though Seattle keeps more park space near the centre if you would rather not leave town.
Families drawn to the shore: Seattle, with 100 beaches nearby and the water 1km from the centre. Both have 1 theme park, but San Francisco has roughly three times the attractions near the centre.
What the numbers don't tell you
Cost is the one comparison you cannot make here. The value figure is a national price level, identical for the two by construction, and no daily budget figure exists for either city, so nothing in this data says which trip costs more.
Sunshine is missing for both, so the monthly picture rests on temperature, rainfall and sea temperature alone; that side of the weather is unmeasured, not poor. Closeness to the water is also not the same as swimming weather: the warmest month reaches 14°C in San Francisco and 12°C in Seattle, so the shore is for walking.
When should you go?
The figures behind each month. Each row is shaded against that destination's own year, so the deepest cell is its best month for that measure and the palest its weakest. Shades are not comparable between the two rows.
Temperature and rainfall are thirty-year climate normals, averaged over the years shown. Seattle: 1991-2020 normals, Seattle-Tacoma Airport (17.3 km from centre). San Francisco: 1981-2010 normals, Alameda Naval Air Station (9.1 km from centre).
San Francisco's window is wide: June to October brings highs of 22-23°C and rainfall of 0-27mm, and April and May already work at 20°C. Winter stays mild but wet, so the shoulder months carry the trip.
Seattle is worth the trip in July and August, when highs reach 25°C and rain falls to 15-25mm, the only reliably dry stretch. Either side of it rain climbs past 99mm from October, and midwinter highs of 8°C make outdoor days short.
Getting there
| Flying from | Seattle | San Francisco |
|---|---|---|
| PhoenixPHX, AZA | 2 h 45 m no fares SEA · 18 km | 1 h 55 m no fares SFO · 18 km |
| TokyoHND, NRT | 9 h 45 m no fares SEA · 18 km | 10 h 25 m no fares SFO · 18 km |
| New YorkJFK, EWR, LGA | 5 h 15 m €300-424 SEA · 18 km | 5 h 35 m €286-328 1 stop SFO · 18 km |
| Los AngelesLAX, BUR, SNA, VNY | 2 h 30 m €111-203 SEA · 18 km | 1 h 20 m no fares OAK · 18 km |
| DallasDFW, DAL, AFW | 3 h 50 m €204-286 1 stop SEA · 18 km | 3 h 25 m no fares SFO · 18 km |
| DenverDEN, APA | 2 h 35 m no fares SEA · 18 km | 2 h 30 m no fares SFO · 18 km |
| SeoulICN, GMP | 10 h 30 m no fares SEA · 18 km | 11 h 20 m €662-735 SFO · 18 km |
| LondonLHR, LGW, STN, LTN +2 | 9 h 45 m no fares SEA · 18 km | 10 h 50 m no fares SFO · 18 km |
| GuadalajaraGDL | 4 h 45 m no fares SEA · 18 km | 3 h 45 m no fares OAK · 18 km |
| DubaiDXB, DWC | 14 h 40 m €1,006-1077 2 stops SEA · 18 km | 16 h 0 m €1,005-1027 1 stop SFO · 18 km |
The busiest departure cities for these two, with a place kept for each other part of the world. Busiest means arriving passengers where an official count exists, and where none does, the number of non-stop services flown: official route statistics are published by the European reporting countries and by nobody else, so a table ranked on them alone would offer a reader in New York or Tokyo ten European cities. Flying times are estimated from the distance between airports, and every row is a city flown non-stop to both. Where the typical offer connects anyway, the stops are shown. Under each figure is the airport the flight lands at and how far that is from the centre, because the nearest airport is not always the one a route is flown to. Where both columns name the same airport it is one flight, and the difference between the two is the distance printed beside it. Typical return fares for 2026-08 to 2026-10, cached market data up to 7 days old. The figure is the middle half of the offers found, so a single price means they agreed and a range means they did not; for a typical route that middle half spans about a quarter of the median, and for the least settled routes rather more than the median itself.
Before you go
| Measure | Seattle | San Francisco |
|---|---|---|
| Currency | US Dollar (USD) | US Dollar (USD) |
| Sockets | AB120 V, 60 Hz | AB120 V, 60 Hz |
| Driving side | Right | Right |
| Time zone | UTC-8, UTC-7 in summer | UTC-8, UTC-7 in summer |
| Emergency number | 911 | 911 |
| Elevation | 40 m | 16 m |
| Main airport | Seattle–Tacoma International Airport (SEA)18 km from centre135 non-stop destinations | San Francisco International Airport (SFO)18 km from centre142 non-stop destinations |
| Public holidays this year | 11 days | 13 days |
By the numbers
| Measure | Seattle | San Francisco |
|---|---|---|
| City population | 737,015 | 873,965 |
| People per km² | 1,996 | 1,455 |
| Museums within 10 km | 27 | 50 |
| UNESCO World Heritage sites within 50 km | 0 | 0 |
| Distinct cuisines in the centre | 78 | 108 |
| Swim season, months above 21 °C | None | None |
Where else could you go?
Every comparison below shares a destination with this one, so you can follow Seattle or San Francisco somewhere new.