San Francisco or Portland?
Two destinations compared on nine measures of openly sourced data. Weight what matters to you and the verdict follows.
Your match
Wins on beaches & swimming and sights concentration with your weighting.
Has no clear advantage with the weighting you have chosen.
What matters to you?
Pick a travel style or drag the sliders. The match scores above update as you do.
The verdict
Choose Portland if you want a proper warm summer: July and August reach 27-28°C with very little rain, and the eating and drinking hold up well without the scale of a larger city.
Choose San Francisco if you want more within walking range of the centre, more museums and attractions, coast and protected land close by, and mild daytime temperatures from spring through to late autumn.
Scoreboard
Each measure scored 0 to 100. Open a row for the figures behind the score.
Beaches & swimming. San Francisco leads by 60 points.60
| San Francisco | Portland | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 60 | 0 |
| Swim season months | 0 | 0 |
| Beaches 10 km | 44 | 27 |
| Coast distance | 2 km | 69 km |
| Water distance | 2 km | — |
Places to eat. San Francisco leads by 9 points.9
| San Francisco | Portland | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 83 | 74 |
| Restaurants within 2 km of centre | 2,359 | 1,011 |
| Effective number of cuisines within 2 km | 39 | 44 |
Museums & heritage. San Francisco leads by 9 points.9
| San Francisco | Portland | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 44 | 35 |
| Museums within 10 km | 57 | 23 |
| Museums within 2 km of centre | 29 | 15 |
| Share of museums within 2 km % | 51 | 65 |
| Unesco sites within 50 km | 0 | 0 |
Nightlife. San Francisco leads by 10 points.10
| San Francisco | Portland | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 68 | 58 |
| Drinking venues within 4 km | 1,434 | 942 |
| Drinking venues within 2 km of centre | 928 | 518 |
| Share of drinking venues within 2 km % | 65 | 55 |
| Nightclubs within 4 km | 97 | 32 |
Nature & day trips. San Francisco leads by 25 points.25
| San Francisco | Portland | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 60 | 35 |
| Protected land share 50 km % | 17 | 13 |
| Landscape blanket share 50 km % | 4 | 3 |
| Land share of disc % | 57 | 100 |
| Park area within 2 km | 45 hectares | 37 hectares |
Good for families. San Francisco leads by 23 points.23
| San Francisco | Portland | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 57 | 34 |
| Tourist attractions within 2 km | 48 | 8 |
| Park area within 2 km | 45 hectares | 37 hectares |
| Theme parks within 30 km | 1 | 2 |
Sights concentration. San Francisco leads by 28 points.28
| San Francisco | Portland | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 63 | 35 |
| Notable places within 2 km | 147 | 29 |
| Min wikipedia languages | 5 | 5 |
Value for money. San Francisco and Portland are level on 43.
| San Francisco | Portland | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 43 | 43 |
| Price level global | 100 | 100 |
| Daily budget | — | — |
Year-round weather. San Francisco leads by 13 points.13
| San Francisco | Portland | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 78 | 65 |
| Monthly daytime high | 14 °C to 23.2 °C | 7.9 °C to 27.7 °C |
| Monthly rainfall | 0 mm to 105 mm | 13 mm to 145 mm |
| Dry months | 7 | 3 |
Where they differ
Portland's advantage is heat and a family day out: summer highs reach 28°C against San Francisco's 23°C, and there are 2 theme parks within reach against 1. Its museums, though fewer, sit tightly around the centre.
San Francisco has many times as many notable places within walking distance of the centre, and many more attractions near it. Nature is closer too: 17% of the surrounding land is protected against 13% around Portland, with 44 beaches nearby against 27.
Where they are alike
Eating out is what both do best. San Francisco has about twice as many restaurants near the centre, but the range of kitchens is much the same, so varied meals are easy in either.
Museums and nights out follow that pattern: San Francisco has more of both, yet neither has a UNESCO-listed place within day-trip reach, and both keep a good part of their drinking and clubbing close to the centre.
Which traveller are you?
Someone travelling to eat and drink: San Francisco, with about twice as many restaurants near the centre and roughly three times as many nightclubs, most of them within reach of wherever you stay.
A family with children: San Francisco for the density of attractions and the park space near the centre, unless theme parks are the point, in which case Portland has 2 within reach against 1.
A walker who wants heat: Portland in July and August, at 27-28°C with little rain. For coast and protected land across more of the year, San Francisco, though its sea peaks at 14°C.
What the numbers don't tell you
No cost comparison is possible here. The value figure both cities carry is a national price level, identical for the two by construction, and the data holds no daily budget for either, so nothing in it tells you which trip costs more. Judge that from your own quotes for flights, rooms and meals.
The weather picture is also incomplete: no nearby station reports sunshine hours, so that side is unmeasured rather than poor. And a beach count is not a swimming season. San Francisco's 44 beaches sit beside a sea that peaks at 14°C, which is walking weather, not bathing weather.
When should you go?
The figures behind each month. Each row is shaded against that destination's own year, so the deepest cell is its best month for that measure and the palest its weakest. Shades are not comparable between the two rows.
Temperature and rainfall are thirty-year climate normals, averaged over the years shown. San Francisco: 1981-2010 normals, Alameda Naval Air Station (9.1 km from centre). Portland: 1991-2020 normals, Portland International Airport (9.8 km from centre).
Portland is at its best in July and August, when highs reach 27-28°C and rain falls away to 13-14mm; September still holds 25°C. The rest of the year is cooler and much wetter.
San Francisco spreads its usable weather far wider, roughly April to October, with September the pick at 23°C and about 7mm of rain. Winter stays mild but wet, so a February trip works better there than in Portland.
Getting there
| Flying from | San Francisco | Portland |
|---|---|---|
| PhoenixPHX, AZA | 1 h 55 m no fares SFO · 18 km | 2 h 35 m no fares PDX · 10 km |
| New YorkJFK, EWR, LGA | 5 h 35 m €286-328 1 stop SFO · 18 km | 5 h 20 m no fares PDX · 10 km |
| Los AngelesLAX, BUR, SNA, VNY | 1 h 20 m no fares OAK · 18 km | 2 h 15 m no fares PDX · 10 km |
| ChicagoORD, MDW, DPA, PWK +1 | 4 h 10 m €196-293 1 stop SFO · 18 km | 3 h 55 m no fares PDX · 10 km |
| DenverDEN, APA | 2 h 30 m no fares SFO · 18 km | 2 h 30 m €167-182 PDX · 10 km |
| DallasDFW, DAL, AFW | 3 h 25 m no fares SFO · 18 km | 3 h 45 m no fares PDX · 10 km |
| VancouverYVR, YDT | 2 h 10 m no fares SFO · 18 km | 1 h 10 m no fares PDX · 10 km |
| MinneapolisMSP, STP | 3 h 40 m no fares SFO · 18 km | 3 h 20 m no fares PDX · 10 km |
| FrankfurtFRA, HHN | 11 h 25 m no fares SFO · 18 km | 10 h 30 m no fares PDX · 10 km |
| GuadalajaraGDL | 3 h 45 m no fares OAK · 18 km | 4 h 35 m no fares PDX · 10 km |
The busiest departure cities for these two, with a place kept for each other part of the world. Busiest means arriving passengers where an official count exists, and where none does, the number of non-stop services flown: official route statistics are published by the European reporting countries and by nobody else, so a table ranked on them alone would offer a reader in New York or Tokyo ten European cities. Flying times are estimated from the distance between airports, and every row is a city flown non-stop to both. Where the typical offer connects anyway, the stops are shown. Under each figure is the airport the flight lands at and how far that is from the centre, because the nearest airport is not always the one a route is flown to. Where both columns name the same airport it is one flight, and the difference between the two is the distance printed beside it. Typical return fares for 2026-09 to 2026-10, cached market data up to 7 days old. The figure is the middle half of the offers found, so a single price means they agreed and a range means they did not; for a typical route that middle half spans about a quarter of the median, and for the least settled routes rather more than the median itself.
Before you go
| Measure | San Francisco | Portland |
|---|---|---|
| Currency | US Dollar (USD) | US Dollar (USD) |
| Sockets | AB120 V, 60 Hz | AB120 V, 60 Hz |
| Driving side | Right | Right |
| Time zone | UTC-8, UTC-7 in summer | UTC-8, UTC-7 in summer |
| Emergency number | 911 | 911 |
| Elevation | 16 m | 152 m |
| Main airport | San Francisco International Airport (SFO)18 km from centre142 non-stop destinations | Portland International Airport (PDX)10 km from centre87 non-stop destinations |
| Public holidays this year | 13 days | 12 days |
By the numbers
| Measure | San Francisco | Portland |
|---|---|---|
| City population | 873,965 | 652,503 |
| People per km² | 1,455 | 1,736 |
| Museums within 10 km | 50 | 17 |
| UNESCO World Heritage sites within 50 km | 0 | 0 |
| Distinct cuisines in the centre | 108 | 82 |
| Swim season, months above 21 °C | None | – |
Where else could you go?
Every comparison below shares a destination with this one, so you can follow San Francisco or Portland somewhere new.